Vol. 52, No. 1 • November 2014 • .pdf version
Dana O'Neil: Being all a-Twitter has its perks
Joe Mitch: Spread the word about USBWA benefits
Credentialing Task Force makes recommendations
Kentucky, UConn are preseason favorites
Miller wins USBWA scholarship
Best Writing Contest winners announced

Online Credentialing Task Force makes recommendations


Bookmark and Share  

Sometimes it helps to be a little naïve and idealistic.

When we formed the USBWA’s Online Credentialing Task Force, the goal seemed simple: Figure out how to support legitimate online journalists in their efforts to cover college basketball and help the institutions that grant credentials to make good decisions. Simple?

More from the USBWA:
Best Writing Contest winners
2014-15 USBWA officers

In hindsight, the task was like Eureka College trying to take on Duke. Forget about winning or even keeping the score respectable. The challenge is so enormous, you start thinking how great it would be just to reach the first media timeout with a tie.

Did we succeed? I think so, but we’re thankful for the TO so we can re-evaluate and consider how to attack the next four-minute segment.

We endorsed 14 websites, in addition to the large national sites that we grandfathered before tipoff. Those big boys and girls don’t need our endorsement, but we wanted to avoid confusion by omission. The sites we added via the review process can hold their own with the big brands when it comes to quality and commitment to standards of good journalism, but like a lot of those 12-13-14 seeds in the NCAA tournament, they’re not household names. Hopefully, our endorsement will help correct that.

The full task force conducted several teleconferences to identify a list of standards and best practices that any respectable journalism enterprise employs. Our first thought was to publish those and let nature take its course. If a website appealed to us for help, we could apply those guidelines case-by-case. But that wasn’t realistic.

So we set up a process through which websites could apply for USBWA endorsement. A subcommittee of the task force was charged with reviewing applicants. We received almost 50 by the Sept. 1 deadline, and finished making our decisions in early October. The endorsed list is published on our website, and CoSIDA agreed to distribute to its members.

One important point: While we expect media directors to give full consideration to the endorsees, the schools retain the right to grant or deny credentials to anyone. But USBWA will go to bat for endorsees who encounter problems.

Also, we received a lot of applications from traditional media outlets – newspapers, magazines, TV/radio stations – and from individuals and some sports information directors. We did not endorse traditional media outlets because they already have access to full consideration. Nor did we endorse individuals, whom we classified as freelancers, and decided they could obtain credentials as freelancers have for decades.

We will clarify those points for the next application cycle.

But we also realize the landscape will continue to evolve, and we need to adapt. If you have suggestions for improving the process, or rationale to consider expanding our scope, please email me – kwessler@pjstar.com – and I will share your thoughts with the task force.

ENDORSED LIST: Allsportsdiscussion.com; Bluestarmedia.org; Cityofbasketballlove.com; Eagletotem.net; Hoopville.com; Houstonroundballreview.com; Insidethehall.com; Louisville.scout.com; Metbasketballwriters.org; Midmajormadness.com; Netscoutsbasketball.com; Pickinsplinters.com; Projectshanks.com; Umhoops.com.

May 2018
March 2018
January 2018
November 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
November 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
November 2015
May 2015
March 2015
January 2015
November 2014
May 2014
March 2014
January 2014
November 2013
May 2013
March 2013
January 2013
November 2012
May 2012
March 2012
January 2012
November 2011
August 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
November 2010
May 2010
March 2010
February 2010
November 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
November 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
November 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
November 2006
May 2006
March 2006
January 2006
November 2005
May 2005 (.pdf)
March 2005 (.pdf)
January 2005 (.pdf)
November 2004 (.pdf)
May 2004 (.pdf)
March 2004 (.pdf)
January 2004 (.pdf)
November 2003 (.pdf)
May 2003 (.pdf)
March 2003 (.pdf)
January 2003 (.pdf)
November 2002 (.pdf)
January 2002 (.pdf)
November 2001 (.pdf)