Vol. 50, No. 2 January 2013 .pdf version
INSIDE THIS ISSUE ...
John Akers: We saved what seats we could
Joe Mitch: Scholarship will aid member's son or daughter
Kirk Wessler: Holding fire was the right approach
Frank Burlison: Search for Most Courageous candidates
Shaheen, Katha Quinn: A perfect match
Armstrong claims first, second in best writing contest
Complete writing contest results

Search for Most Courageous candidates is ongoing

By FRANK BURLISON
Third Vice-President
frank.burlison@gmail.com

Bookmark and Share  

LAGUNA NIGUEL, Calif. – There are a lot of inspiring stories on the college basketball front and not all of them involve late-game jump shots or defensive stands.

One of my tasks as a USBWA officer is to search out and sort through as many potential candidates for the USBWA "Most Courageous Awards" (one each for men and women) that will be presented in Atlanta during Final Four weekend.

Reminders:
2012 Best Writing Contest winners
Invite a colleague to join the USBWA
Nominate a deserving award candidate
USBWA scholarship information, application

Via solicitations to conference and institution basketball media directors – and via forwarded story links from other USBWA officers (thank you, Coach Akers) – I've already been alerted to the compelling stories of several obvious candidates of both genders.

But I'd be disappointed if I missed out on other strong candidates because I didn't do enough due diligence.

So I'm asking you to provide me with some of your "diligence," if you don't mind.

Please drop me a note (frank.burlison@gmail.com) with the names of the man or woman – or both – that you believe merit consideration for the respective honors, along with brief backgrounds into their stories, as well as links to any media reports on them.

As the USBWA membership directory details so succinctly, "The U.S. Basketball Writers Association annually recognizes a player, coach, official or administrator who has demonstrated extraordinary courage reflecting honor on the sport of amateur basketball." So that leaves a lot of leeway for candidates to come from any level of college hoops and any position remotely connected to it from within a campus or conference office.

What better example of the "instant gratification age" that exists, as in so many avenues of society, squarely in the world of college basketball than the rush to judgment when it comes to heavily touted freshmen?

Less than a month – in some cases, just five or six games – there have already been a litany of one-year players being designated as various degrees of "disappointments" because their play hasn't been nearly as productive and/or spectacular as had been projected by the recruiting or NBA draft "gurus" that are referenced so liberally within media reports.

The problem with that rush to judgment, of sorts, is multi-fold:

For one, shouldn't a player be allowed at least as entire season before he is anointed as "every bit as good as the gurus touted" or "a flop"?

Some players, through emotional or physical maturity (remember, there are a lot of players entering college hoops these days as 20-year-old freshmen, because of being "held back" a year in middle school or high school, or a year at a "prep school"), are not as advanced as a lot of their heavily touted peers.

Or, in many instances, they weren't exposed to the caliber of fundamental coaching needed to make a smooth and successful adjustment to college hoops from Jump Street.

Secondly, those doing the "touting" of said players when they were on the high school (or prep school levels) sometimes didn't do a quality job of evaluating those players' "skills" and "potential" for success on the college level.

There are a lot of "recruiting reporters" who do a superb job of tracking down players' college choices and in creating a network of "sources" who tip them off when a player has "committed" or is about to do so.

Their ability to sit down and watch high school players and break down why they are – or aren't – quality prospects isn't quite as effective, however.

And most of those certainly aren't qualified to riff on a 17-, 18- or 19-year-old's ability to "be a pro" or "play in the league (aka, NBA)".

As someone who has watched, and written about, the vast majority of the better high school, college and NBA players since the late 1970s, I feel I'm more qualified than most to comment on the potential of a players success in college and then, possibly, in the NBA.

And it's almost a hit-and-miss proposition – hopefully, I've hit a lot more evaluations than I've missed.

Always be cautious when quoting, or using as background reference, someone who refers to a high school standout or college player as "a sure-fire pro." That phrase is so often spouted by someone who really has no idea how difficult it is to get drafted, much less stick on an NBA roster.

Being prudent in writing or discussing a player's "potential" in college and the NBA is always the best policy.

Doing so will help you avoid the feeling that you need to declare that player a "disappointment" even before he has suited up for his first conference game.

March 2018
January 2018
November 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
November 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
November 2015
May 2015
March 2015
January 2015
November 2014
May 2014
March 2014
January 2014
November 2013
May 2013
March 2013
January 2013
November 2012
May 2012
March 2012
January 2012
November 2011
August 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
November 2010
May 2010
March 2010
February 2010
November 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
November 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
November 2007
May 2007
March 2007
February 2007
November 2006
May 2006
March 2006
January 2006
November 2005
May 2005 (.pdf)
March 2005 (.pdf)
January 2005 (.pdf)
November 2004 (.pdf)
May 2004 (.pdf)
March 2004 (.pdf)
January 2004 (.pdf)
November 2003 (.pdf)
May 2003 (.pdf)
March 2003 (.pdf)
January 2003 (.pdf)
November 2002 (.pdf)
January 2002 (.pdf)
November 2001 (.pdf)
.PDF'S BEST VIEWED WITH ADOBE READER X | EDITOR: JOHN AKERS